A recent article on religion in New Scientist prompted a spate of letters to the editor. I'm at a disadvantage, because I haven't gotten to the issue with the religion article in it yet. But I was astonished by a comment by Gary Betcherman of London (U.K.):
The 17th-century Jewish-Dutch philosopher Spinoza discredited the notion that God can be both outside the universe and within it at the same time. (New Scientist, July 29-August 4, 2006, p. 22.)
I'm not familiar with Spinoza's work, and I couldn't find proof of this statement anywhere on the web. I'd really like to, because it proves that game programmers don't exist. This is of special concern to me, since I've written a few game programs in my life and worked with a team of programmers on a major game.
If I don't exist, I'd like to know. I'm funny that way.
Game programmers often refer to the game as a "world" or a "universe." As programmers, they have amazing powers: they can stop the game, go in, and edit absolutely anything. Got a character that died? Resurrecting the character is trivial. Feed 5000+ game characters with a couple loaves and fishes? Simple! Have a character walk on water? Why stop at water? The character can walk on air for all that!
In other words, a game programmer has all the powers one might attribute to God, with the exception of omnisciently knowing the future.
Is the universe a simulation on God's computer? A simulation running on something that we can't even comprehend? What if it's a simulation inside God's mind?1 2 3
If Spinoza has proven that God cannot exist both outside and inside the universe, then clearly, game programmers cannot exist.
There are two flaws in my argument, of course. One would be that AI is impossible on a computer. From what I did read of Spinoza, though, he did not accept Descartes' dualism and thus would argue that AI must be possible. Of course, I could also argue a "Matrix-like" simulation, so in any case, I can dispense with that argument summarily.
The second flaw is that I wasn't a good enough game programmer, and that no one is. The game programmers will only cease to exist when they get good enough.
To which I say "Thank goodness game programming was a passing phase for me!"
Can anyone fill me in on Spinoza's argument, or did Mr. Betcherman simply doze during his freshman philosophy class?
- Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those computers! Sorry — that's an obligatory Slashdot reader joke. [back]
- It's worth noting that, while such a simulation inside God's mind would mean everything was made up of God at some level, it wouldn't be pantheisitic. The universe of the game would be an emergent property and thus trees, cars, and people would not be God. [back]
- I'm not saying this is how the universe is; I'm merely pointing out one possible way that God could obviously exist and interact with our universe. There are many more and, as a student of relativity, quantum mechanics, and brane theory, I could point out that there are many other possibilities as well! [back]

