UnSpace

Writing and Photography

Newest UnSpace Flickr Photos
www.flickr.com
January 30th, 2007

Squiggles’ Story

"What color is the sky in the world Bourke parakeets come from?"

Squiggles was the first chick his mother, Betty Bourke, had ever hatched. A fairly old female bird, she'd rarely laid eggs and never incubated them. For some reason, she didn't know what to do with Squiggles. The first look at the new hatchling revealed that the mother wasn't feeding it. Nancy removed Squiggles from the nest, fed it carefully with a tiny eyedropper, and put it back. But the mother's instincts wouldn't kick in, and after several tries at getting her to accept the baby, we decided to remove Squiggles from the nest.

Hand-feeding newly hatched lovebirds and budgies is an incredibly difficult task. Even with baby cockatiels, which are much larger, there's a high fatality rate. We have learned to make the formula thin and to mix feces from one of the parents into the food to provide bacteria. Slowly, our success rate has been improving, but it's not something we like to do.

Squiggles, smaller than the tip of my pinky, was failing under hand-feeding. Whatever we were doing with the hourly feedings, we could see it wasn't enough. Squiggles was dying.

Tragedy gave us a way to save Squiggles. A budgie mother had a baby that died during hatching. We've had cross-species egg fostering in the past, but never with a budgie. As a last-ditch effort to save Squiggles, we put Squiggles in with that budgie mother. Would the mother accept Squiggles as her chick? We watched through the nestbox hole as she used her beak to scoot Squiggles under her. Checking a few hours later, she moved aside just long enough for us to see Squiggles' crop was full of food from his adoptive mother. Success!

The days went on, and Squiggles continued to thrive with his mother. Some of the budgie mother's other eggs had hatched, and we hoped to pull Squiggles at the same time as the other chicks. Having a nest-mate in the incubator seems to work better for the baby birds. But one day, we looked in and saw that the mother had ripped out the feathers on Squiggles' back. Squiggle's father was a rosy Bourke, and we could tell by the remaining feathers that Squiggles was also rosy — a female. The budgie mother apparently decided pink feathers were "wrong" and tried to remove them.

Squiggles went into an incubator by herself. She wound up getting a lot of attention from us humans to make up for the lack of incubator mates. Nancy would sit and cuddle Squiggles in her hands while we'd watch TV. She'd pass the little bird on to me and I'd hold and talk to the little bird. There's a trick where you "bob" a baby bird by putting it's beak between your index finger and thumb. The bird thinks you're feeding it, and it does the "bobbing" motion to try to get food from you. Bobbing seems to help with digestion, and so we did it.

Squiggles got her name at this time, for the way she squiggled around in your hands.

Eventually, Squiggle's budgie clutch mates were pulled and placed in the incubator. Squiggles was glad to have the babies in with her, although she still got a bit more human attention than the budgies.

As the budgie babies grew, though, one of them saw pink and salmon feathers on Squiggles and decided this was "wrong." Because the baby had trouble plucking Squiggles, we didn't notice the damage at first. We had to separate Squiggles again. Squiggles got a lot of our attention as a result.

When it was time to go into the flying room, Squiggles flew to the floor. She didn't like the other budgies, for some reason. Her parents, back in the flying room themselves, were afraid of her. To them, Squiggles was just a new Bourke, and a clumsy immature one. Squiggles tried to follow her biological parents around, and they ran from her!

Squiggles had one clutch mate budgie that she got along with. When that bird wound up in the flying room, the two hung out. Squiggles, while still a ground-feeder with the strange reactions of any Bourke parakeet, took on a few budgie traits as well.

In the morning, Nancy would sit on a chair in the flying room and Squiggles would come to her. Squiggles liked "hair baths" where she'd "bathe" in Nancy's hair where it cascaded over her neck. Squiggles wouldn't "thumb wrestle" like the budgies. She'd tolerate being snuggled, but mostly she liked to perch on humans and try to preen us. When I grew my beard this past Autumnal Equinox, she loved to preen it.

We thought of selling Squiggles. She would have made someone a lovely tame Bourke parakeet, but we loved her. We decided to keep her.

Squiggles wanted to see more of the world. She would try to sneak out from the flying room into the rest of the house — the rest of the house with large parrots who would look at her as a surprise snack or threat or both. When we'd leave the flying room, we'd have to stand at the door, wave a hand, and go "Boogie boogie boogie!" to keep Squiggles in. In the past month, a new addition to the flying room, a friendly green budgie, had learned from Squiggles about sneaking out of the room. The two would double team us. One would distract us while the other tried to escape. After a few rounds of this, we saw what they were doing and didn't fall for it. Still, the intelligent and coordinated behavior impressed us.

Many things make Squiggles' death difficult. She was a bird we knew well and loved. She was young. And in a number of ways, her death was the result of things that we did, some of which were designed to keep her safe.

All the flying room birds go cage at night. They feel secure being in something that a predator cannot get into. They don't understand that the entire room and the entire house are "cages" that predators cannot get into. If not caged at night, the birds will occasionally become frightened and fly about at high speed, slamming into walls or cages or windows. We put them in the cages for their own safety and leave on a night-light so they can see there are no predators.

The Bourkes are very mild birds, and so they go into the cage where the gentler birds go. There's a cockatiel who is crippled who goes in that cage, and some of the budgies go in there, too. The "female" cage is one where the rough-and-tumble females go. Devoid of males to fight over, and with far too many birds for anyone to think of trying to nest, the cage is fairly calm.

For many of the rest of the birds decide which cage they go into. Some want Nancy to put them away. Some want me to put them away. A few require us to cheer them on as they climb over and then into the cage. Rarely do we need to catch them. They may not like going cage, but they know it's better than being exposed to all the "predators" that roam the bird room at night.

The bird room also contains a scientific experiment. Nancy has been selecting the tamest and most intelligent budgies to breed. There are some third and fourth generation birds from this breeding program now. Some are self-taming, others remain far tamer than their non-tame counterparts. Eventually, Nancy has been aiming for birds that do not have to be hand-raised to be human-friendly and tame.

Along the way, though, a strange phenomenon has emerged. Some of the birds in the breeding program have lost their fear response. We've jokingly named them "piranhakeets." When thumb-wrestling with a human, they will start biting hard. Since they're small birds, there's not much danger to the humans. The bitey-ness was an annoyance, something we hoped would go away with the breeding program. Dogs lost much of their testosterone levels as they were bred — hence the floppy ears and curved tails. We expected the budgies to do the same (although we did not expect them to get floppy ears and curved tails). Dogs and their wolf ancestors, though, are apex predators. Birds aren't — they're prey, and it's possible the search for tameness has resulted in increased aggressiveness. We hadn't seen any significant problems, and so we didn't worry about it.

Many of the female budgies have decided it's breeding time. Why, we don't know. They obviously don't realize there's snow outside! Perhaps it's the sprouts the birds have been given lately as their fresh nightly food. Female budgerigars (actually, most parrots) become far more aggressive when they are in breeding mode.

Somehow, a female piranhakeet wound up in the mild cage. Did she think the pink feathers were "wrong"? Did she see Squiggles as a "threat"? Or, with her increased intelligence and aggressiveness, was the attack something she simply enjoyed? We heard nothing that night, but in the morning when we went to release the birds for the day, Squiggles was hunkered in one corner, obviously mauled. Only the female piranhakeet had blood on her.

We set up a heated incubator for Squiggles. I tried to feed her some baby formula, as I had months ago. A call to the vet, a warmed up car and a warm cooler, and we attempted to get her to help. Squiggles died a mile from our house.

Of all the mistakes we made with Squiggles, the last was whether she would have done better staying in the incubator. She lost enough blood that she needed more medical care than I could have given her; she needed antibiotics and perhaps a subcutaneous injection of fluids (the only way fluids can be replaced in a bird of her size). Would Squiggles still be alive if we'd kept her at home? I don't know. I did the best I could.

I miss my Squiggles coming to me every time I enter the flying room. She had a hard life she didn't deserve.

January 29th, 2007

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ignores Radwaste Storage Problem

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has stated that "Nuclear power plants will not be required to put up defenses against terrorist attacks from the air, according to a rule enacted Monday by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission." The containment vessels of commercial nuclear power plants are sufficiently robust to withstand a direct impact from even the largest jet airliner.

Unfortunately, not all the radioactives at a nuclear power plant are in the reactor, safe within the containment vessel. Spent nuclear rods are highly radioactive, containing the fission fragments from nuclear reaction and neutron absorption. Removed from the reactor, they are stored on-site either in dry cask systems or in pools of water. These casks and pools are not within an airplane-proof containment vessel. A fully-fueld jumbo jet is not needed to breach this minimal containment.

20 metric tons per year of used nuclear fuel is generated by a typical plant; 2,000 metric tons is generated by the nuclear industry per year.

With global warming, nuclear power is becoming a necessity, and yet there is still no system in place to deal with the radioactive waste. The Yucca Mountains storage facility is still unused. And so, in a lot of nuclear power plants, the radwaste builds up, making it an even more tempting target for terrorists.

What is the NRC thinking? Nuclear power plants are not safe from terrorist attacks, and it wouldn't even take a jet plane.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission needs to be held responsible, and not simply come up with a cheap way of helping out the nuclear power industry.

Note: This is a publicly known problem. I have not spoken of this for over a decade because I did not wish to give terrorists useful scenarios. Well, you know what? The terrorists know, but our government is relying on us not knowing what the terrorists know so they can lie to us and tell us we're safe. I'm breaking my silence. Big deal, it's not like I'm the first.

Back when I taught the chemical, radiological, and biological segment of the HazMat training course in the late '80s, I actually joked about a plane into a radwaste pool at a nuclear power plant. It was an absurdity, on the order of our most famous "Zulu Incident" joke: an airplane into a high rise tower.

At the time, it was funny. Something that could never happen. Same thing with a biological HazMat, the third topic I covered. What urban HazMat team is ever going to have to deal with a possible anthrax spill?

Now, it just gives me the creeps.

January 29th, 2007

Squiggles Attacked, Died

One of the budgies ripped out a tremendous number of feathers from Squiggles the Bourke parakeet. Here's a very recent photo of Squiggles:

Squiggles the parakeet

Poor Squiggles. We're on our way to the vet's now.

Update: Squiggles died before we could get her to the vet.

January 29th, 2007

A Nervous Cirrus



DSC_0854-6, originally uploaded by unspace.

African grey parrots can be very anxious. Cirrus was a bit concerned about the camera at first. Giving her a peanut helped her calm down.

Cirrus came to us missing one toe. We don't know how, but it appears to have been surgically repaired. Poor birdy!

Let's see if I can post from Firefox….

January 29th, 2007

DSC_0943-6



DSC_0943-6, originally uploaded by unspace.

I'm learning to "blog" photos from Flickr. Let's see how this works out. The baby in my hand, by the way, is one of the three new "weens" we pulled yesterday. The mother bird was having trouble handling 3 weens — she lost a fourth that hatched much later and got trampled by the other three.

The photo is for my online photography class. Yeah, there's not much contrast, is there? That's a problem.

BTW: In trying to set up my Flickr account so that it would post to UnSpace, I discovered that you have to do the setup from Internet Explorer. Firefox doesn't work. Weird.

January 28th, 2007

Blog Repair

I found out how to repair the blog — get the latest version of the Tiga theme!

I'm messing with the colors. I'm not quite sure why I'm going for "Painful green" but I am….

I haven't been able to fix the photo boxes. Sigh.

January 28th, 2007

Another Sunset Photo

Sunset

You can click on the photo for a larger version. This photo was taken the same day as the other sunset photos.

January 28th, 2007

Saturday Walk at Piney Fork

Peters Creek in Piney Fork

Clouds filled the sky today when I went for a walk in Piney Fork near the Iron Bridge. The temperature got up to almost 40°F, leaving just patches of snow here and there. The ice on the twin ponds was melting.

Melting ice on the smaller pond.

Ice breaking up on the larger pond.

This was a bad day for a walk, and a bad day for photography. The contrast was low and the overcast sky lit the world with a dingy light. Colors were shades of brown and the weak green of winter, with only occasional patches of white, black, or some other color. I wondered if I could capture the gloom. The cattails and thistles had a beauty even in death.

Cattails on a pond.

Dead thistles.

Two disarticulated deer legs led me to a pile of deer carcasses, scavenged and rotting, almost like a poster for a deer horror flick.

Deer decaying.

The geometry of dormant grape vines cascading up a tree struck me as a good topic.

Grape vine ascending

But finally, I cheated and went for the only spectacular color available from nature at this time of year.

A sumac flower in the midst of winter.

So yes, the photos are underexposed. With some digital tricks, the photos could have appeared to be from a sunny day. But the day was not sunny, and I wanted to catch the feeling of being trapped in winter.

I looked for some way to capture this day, but as I look at these pictures, I feel that I failed. That was the kind of day today was.

January 25th, 2007

Sterilize WET Sponges in the Microwave

A recent article about sterilizing household sponges in the microwave has caused mini-disasters in people's kitchens. Most of the news reports forgot to mention that sponges should be very wet when placed in the microwave for two minutes to sterilize them, and that sponges with metalic content should not be sterilized in this way.

In other words, the microwave boils the germs to death, with the microwave radiation hastening the process.

As the article I linked to points out, the microwaved sponge will be hot for a while after getting "nuked." Apparently this is another necessary warning.

Have people never used their microwaves before, or does my vast interest in science give me superhuman powers of non-stupidity?

January 25th, 2007

Heyyyy Lusi! You Got Some ‘Splainin’ to Do!

An improperly drilled gas well in Indonesia has created a mud volcano that the locals call "Lusi."

I'm only blogging this for the joke potential for the title, although you have to admit a mud volcano that makes 10 square kilometers uninhabitable is impressive.

Less impressive and more predictable is Indonesian politician Aburizal Bakrie's declaration that humans did not cause the mud volcano. Coincidentally, his family runs the company that did the drilling.

In America, no politician with family ties to an involved corporation would ever think of blaming an environmental disaster on natural rather than anthropogenic sources.

Update: For the metrically challenged, 10 square kilometers is about 4 square miles. But honestly, do you have any better idea about the area of square miles than square kilometers? I know I don't.

January 24th, 2007

AJ Performs on YouTube

I remember watching Johnny Carson the night that Axl the parakeet was scheduled to perform. Axl's owner's roommate rolled over on Axl in his sleep, killing Axl. Carson gave the owner, David Cota a new bird — AJ.

AJ is now famous on YouTube:

I love watching AJ perform his tricks!

January 24th, 2007

Known Problem With WP 2.1 “Ella”

The newest version of WP, WP 2.1 "Ella," adds an extra <p> tag in a lot of places — including images. This problem is known.

Playing with Firebug, I was able to figure out that these extra paragraph tags are what's breaking my CSS.

I'm guessing that, given a few days, a fix will be coming out for this. In the meantime, I'm just going to have to put up with my site being fracked up.

If you have not yet upgraded your WP installation to 2.1, I would hold off right now.

And yes, I'm watching "Battlestar Galactica" too much and saying "frack" too much.

January 23rd, 2007

UnSpace Updated: CSS Broken

I just updated to WP 2.1 "Ella." Somewhere, I've got a copy of the CSS I used to create the cute little boxes around the photographs.

As soon as I remember where I put that, I'll fix the blog. I think I can fix it….

Update: The CSS isn't damaged: it's still there and I have absolutely no understanding why it's not working correctly.

Frack. Frack. Frack. Frack.

And, did I mention, Frack!

Update #2: Not only can I not figure out why the CSS is broken, now I can't make decorative ribbon bows. How hard can making a ribbon bow be, especially since I have that nice fancy ribbon bow maker?

I'm rapidly destroying 100 yards of red ribbon trying to make a bow I can picture in my head but apparently have no frackin' hope of ever making. Why do I do this?

I'm not artistic! I can't do this crap. I can't make crafts, I can't paint, and I sure as heck can't photograph. I want to be creative and I should have learned after 48 frackin' years that I don't have a creative neuron in my body. Why am I even trying? This is insane.

Update #3: And at 9 p.m., the State of the Union message is on. It just keeps getting frackin' worse and worse.

Update #4: I bet I could come up with a creative way of destroying this blog. Screwing things up is the only thing I'm good at. Frack. Why do I even try.

January 22nd, 2007

Nestbox Webcam?

I'm contemplating setting up a nestbox videocam.

Nancy breeds parakeets (budgerigars). What would happen if a properly designed nestbox had a webcam in it? Would anyone even care?

I need some help. Can anyone tell me what the minimum focal distance for a webcam is? I'd need a low-light webcam. Any recommendations?

I'd probably have to build the nestbox so that it would permit some light into the nest. Done properly, I think I can reach a compromise between what the birds will want and what the camera will need. Protecting the camera will be a technical problem, but easily solvable.

January 21st, 2007

Near Sunset

The Moon and Venus in the twilight

The Moon and Venus in the twilight. Mercury is lost in the clouds, as is the tail of Comet McNaught.

The Moon comes between the

The "The Moon comes between the "two friends," stars Deneb Algiedi and Nashira. Ice crystals in Earth's upper atmosphere scatter the light from Venus, creating faint "pillars."

Earthshine on the Moon

Earthshine on the Moon. By now, Deneb Algiedi is eclipsed by the Moon. Nashira is too faint to be seen in this photograph — longer duration images taken at the same time show it faintly.

My church at sunset

My church at sunset.

Another view of my church

Another view of my church in the twilight.

Note: Islam uses the first visible crescent of the new Moon to determine the beginning of months and festivals. With the new Moon, the "horns" of the Moon always point in a leftward direction. Yet the crescent on the flags of Muslim countries has the horns pointing in a rightward direction. Almost all Islamic countries are above the equator, and so the "crescent and star" must represent the last of the Old Moon!

As someone who is fairly dyslexic, I'm amazed that I noticed this. So how did the crescent and star become associated with Islam?

The Moon and star dates back at least to the Greeks, for whom it represented Diana, and the symbol is actually an historically late addition to Islam. The Turks conquered Constantinople and made it Istanbul. The symbol for Constantinople was the crescent and star and was taken by the Turks as their symbol. Thesymbol is a secular image, not a religious one.

Fundamentalist Muslims should actually oppose the use of the crescent and star, as Mohamed wished there to be no Islamic "symbols." Not only that, but as I've discovered, it's backwards!

January 20th, 2007

Parakeet Portraiture

Parakeet

Parakeet

Today, the unnamed parakeet from the Christmas Pageant went to a new home today. Before he left, I got a photograph of him.

He's a sweet bird, loves to chew on bamboo, play with shiny objects, and run on the back of the couch like he's a roadrunner. The family he went to is wonderful and should enjoy their new bird!

January 19th, 2007

Nikki the Camera is Repaired

Do not use regular canned gas to get the dust off your camera's CCD sensor. I did, and here's what I had to do to repair my camera.

Back in the blog post "Full Moon," I relayed how I stupidly used some canned gas to attempt to get dust off my Nikon D50 (Nikki) camera's sensor. As I was using it, I noticed the warning "Never use on camera mirrors." Startled, I tilted the camera wrong and rather than gas, I got the liquid form of whatever chemical was used in the can. The liquid squirted on the sensor and left some spots that seemed to go away after a while:

Spots in the image

Spots in the image.

The spots didn't go away; they were only visible with long-duration photos, as I found out when I attempted to take a long-duration photo of our church steeple at sunset:

Church at sunset; spots visible on the sensor

Church at sunset; spots visible on the sensor.

I cannot afford to replace this camera. I'm not sure I could afford to buy the camera in the first place, but I did. If you've been following this blog, you know that I've had fun with my camera. I was devastated by my own carelessness. I looked around, hoping I could figure out a solution to my problem.

Today, I got the Eclipse Optic Cleaning System liquid to go with the Type 2 Sensor Swabs I purchased earlier. There are different size swabs for different size sensors — you may need a different one. The swabs do not come with the liquid. If you notice, there seems to be a consistent problem with me not reading directions.

First, I carefully removed the lens. Next, I locked up the mirror on my camera. On the D50, I pressed "Menu", went to the wrench menu, and highlighted "Mirror Lock-Up". Pressing the "Enter" button gave me the option of "Yes" or "No". I chose "Yes", pressed "Enter", and got the message "Press shutter-release button" Doing so raised the mirror and gave me access to the sensor.

I put two drops on the swabs, as close to dead center as possible. I followed the instructions on the box. Cleaning the crap off my sensor took 4 swabs.

If you look at this 15-second image of the ceiling, you can see the sensor is fairly clean:

15 second ceiling image

15 second ceiling image

There's a little crap in the upper right. Maybe tomorrow, I'll use another Sensor Swab to get the rest. Tonight, I'd like to watch TV and let my heart rest a bit. My anxiety level is through the roof.

Again, do not use a can of compressed gas to clean the dust off your CCD sensor in your camera unless it is specifically for that purpose. If you have to clean your CCD sensor, I recommend the Photographic Solutions Sensor Swab and Eclipse liquid system.

January 19th, 2007

Quick Links for 1/19/2007

It's been a while since I did the "quick links." Here's some for you:

  • Handlers returned an escaped Arkansas chimp to her cage after she cleaned the toilet and refrigerator. I'm betting he "accidentally" escapes once a month from now on.
  • The good news? A cheap, safe drug has been found that kills most cancers. The problem? It's cheap and unpatentable. Drug companies aren't going to be interested in it. Since the medicine is currently in use for other illnesses, I'm curious if doctors will begin "off-label" prescriptions. And yes, if I didn't have to worry about the parrots, I could make this stuff in my basement.
  • Mimicry: to copy another's actions exactly. Imitate: to adapt another's actions to oneself. Cirrus our African grey parrot mimics the phone and microwave. With words, though, she will sit there for hours attempting variations on the tone, inflection, and even combination of words. She's imitating, not mimicking. I had no idea I could have gotten a paper out of it. Yeah, that's Dr. Pepperberg and Alex again, along with another bird they're working with.
  • Pesquet parrot babies hatched! The strange thing is, looking at the babies, I can tell the difference between them, budgerigar, lovebird, and cockatiel babies.
  • Parrots do not have to "parrot" human speech, but they usually do. There's a cute story from Thailand that explains why.
  • The Unseen Blogger links to a article by a chemical engineering company that claims CO2 is being driven by the temperature, not the other way around. To do so, you have to ignore the energy balance equation. This is the sort of nonsense that's being done to block doing something about global warming. If you read down the paper, you'll find a new reason they're promoting for not doing anything: It's too late.
  • For a more reasoned and sensible view of climate change, I'd recommend New Scientist's Environment Special Report.

  • Funky of Ales Rarus sent me a link to this post. I think this is a nice response to the militant atheists.
  • Patients with Multiple Sclerosis appear to do better if they are infected with parasites. In fact, the improvement is "dramatic." This seems to promote the "hygiene hypothesis."
  • Strange, right around the time people are being encouraged to quit smoking, the most addictive substance in cigarettes — nicotine — increases. The cigarette companies claim this is pure "coincidence."
  • Muslims are denouncing Sheik Feiz Mohammed, who released a series of DVDs calling for child martyrs and called Jews "pigs." Pretty much everyone else is denouncing this menace, too.
January 18th, 2007

The Left Hand of the Neutrino

The New Scientist article "Sending Einstein into a spin" (subscription required and recommended!) discusses possible changes to Special Relativity that might explain a puzzle about the neutrino. I'm not sure I buy the proposed changes to Special Relativity — doing so would create severe problems for General Relativity. But the article explains what the problem is with the neutrino — something I never understood before.

Neutrinos are ghostly particles. They're coursing through your body right now, and you don't notice. The particles only interact with other matter via gravity and the Weak force — which, being "weak," doesn't happen all that often. There are three kinds of neutrinos: electron, muon, and tau, which correspond to the three generation types of quarks: up/down, charm/strange, and truth/beauty.1 Neutrinos also have two other properties: they have mass and they have only one kind of spin: left-handed spin.

These last two contradict each other: If you see a left-handed neutrino running away from you and you hop on your motorcycle and pass it, looking back over your shoulder, you'll see a right-handed neutrino. The problem is, we don't see any right-handed neutrinos, and so one would think that neutrinos must go at the speed limit: the speed of light. Neutrinos must not have a rest mass, since nothing with rest mass can go the speed of light.2

We know that neutrinos have mass because of a bizarre little trick they pull. The sun, being the fusion reactor it is, gives of scads of neutrinos. But when we look, we only see 1/3rd of a scad. The Solar Neutrino Deficit was a severe problem for scientists for years. Many proposals were suggested to solve it, most involving the sun being Some Dude on a chariot being pulled through the heavens on horses. Ok, maybe not quite that bad, but the solutions were almost as silly, like the sun being dead but powered by a quantum black hole at it's center.

Now, if you've been paying attention3, you might ask "Hey, there's three kinds of neutrinos, and we're only seeing 1/3rd of the neutrinos we should. You don't suppose…" Bingo! That's exactly it. The neutrinos change flavor on the way to Earth: an electron neutrino can morph into a muon or tau neutrino very easily, so at any time, you only see 1/3rd of the neutrinos you should. Scientists looked, and darn if those cute little neutrinos weren't switching around willy-nilly on the way from the sun!

Quantum mechanics says "No problemo!" The mass of a neutrino permits it to switch from one to the other."

Oops. Neutrinos can't have mass if they go the speed of light. If they don't go the speed of light, then we should see right-handed neutrinos!

Now you see the problem.

There might just be a very prosaic answer. The neutrinos we see are moving at relativistic velocities — near the speed of light. The closer to the speed of light, the more left-handed neutrinos we see and the fewer right-handed neutrinos we can see — the harder it is to "outrun the neutrino and look back over your shoulder." Neutrinos, being the ghostly little things they are, may simply be too hard to see for us to notice the small percentage of right-handed neutrinos. Right-handed neutrinos might also behave differently than left-handed neutrinos, in which case they're harder yet to see, interacting only through gravity. Quantum mechanics and Relativity have no problem with particles that change type — or even disappear — depending on your frame of reference.

Or maybe Relativity is busted, or maybe something else goes on funky at high energies and teeny-tiny distances. Or maybe there's added dimensions, or Some Dude in a chariot rides by and steals all the right-handed neutrinos.

Which one it is has yet to be discovered, although the odds on Chariot Dude are pretty small.


  1. The official designation for the third group is top/bottom. Originally, it was supposed to be truth/beauty, but after swallowing the charm/strange designation for the second group, the physicists spazzed and went for a less bizarre designation that happened to have the same beginning letter. I say "Frack 'em if they can't take a joke." [back]
  2. Yes, the current trend in physics is to use the term "mass" to mean only "rest mass." I'm using the old terminology to avoid confusing people who might wonder if I'm talking about "relativistic mass." For the record, no one uses "relativistic mass" any more. You talk in terms of energy and the whole "relativistic mass" question goes away. It's a lot simpler. [back]
  3. I'm not sure anyone will actually read this far, let alone pay attention. [back]
January 16th, 2007

“He Was a Great Man…Delicious to the End”

Usually, I get depressed at Christmas. This year I didn't, and I can't help but wonder if it was the challenge of learning about our new car — a Saturn Aura — that kept me out of my Yuletide funk. I actually had to read the manual! Give me a gadget to learn, and I'll be happy — or at least be so distracted as to not have time to feel bad.

But it didn't last.

Looking outside, I see the cold, wet, January accumulating a smudge of snow. Inside, there's a white decorative bird cage and some artificial roses awaiting photography for Valentines' Day. I can't take the pictures. My camera is more screwed up than I realized, and I'm waiting for something to come in the mail that might undo the damage.

The thought of artificial flowers takes me back to Mad Magazine's "201 Minutes of a Space Idiocy," their parody of "2001: A Space Odyssey"

Poop: I'm getting so sick of all this artificial food and artificial light and artificial air! Do you know that those are artificial "artificial flowers"!?

Haywire: Why don't you do what I do! Every once in a while I take some fresh meat from one of the freezers!

Poop: Fresh meat?! From one of WHAT freezers?

Haywire: From one of those four white freezers in the medical compartment!

Poop: YOU IDIOT! That's Drs. Downwald, Parkinson, Hemley, and Cowznofski!

Somehow, that cheers me up slightly. I think I'm going to go cook some sausage for breakfast.